Saturday, January 13, 2007

Stephen King's On Writing

I have a confession to make: I have only ever read one Stephen King novel, and I hated every minute of it, even though I forced myself to finish. However, I've heard that he writes very well about writing, so I decided to read his book On Writing.

I loved the book, but it also demonstrated to me why I don't like his novels. I'll start with the reasons why I loved it.

The first part of the book is extremely engaging. He describes his memories, from the earliest to as recent as when he published Carrie - but in a choppy style, as that's how he said he remembers his life. The memories are delightful - he has a wonderful wry sense of humor. It is also fascinating to see how his memories dance around, and finally converge on, his destiny as a writer.

King's sections about writing are also very well written. He has a gift for organization, that much is certain - each discussion is separate, yet flows easily into the next. He doesn't bore the reader with unnecessary how-to advice or proselytizing, but gets his point across succinctly and easily.

However, there were a few things I don't agree with. He talks about how writing for a paper was such a revelation for him, and how he learned to leave out unnecessary words. I think that is a valuable skill, but I also think that a lot fewer words in fiction are unnecessary than in newspaper writing or copywriting. Fiction requires more words to create vivid description. I also don't think that adverbs (you know, the -lys) should be banned quite as religiously (ha! see?) as he recommends.

As I was discussing my disagreements with my fiance, I realized what it is about Stephen King's (fiction) writing style that rankles me so: it's his lack of description, his inability to make me feel a part of the story. It's the cold nakedness of his prose. My favorite writers are ones like Anne Rice, whose description could be aptly called "lush" or "heady." That's what I'm looking for in a novel, and I'm afraid Mr. King just doesn't quite deliver.

When writing about writing, though, he does beautifully. Ironically, he talks about how difficult writing the book was for him, how painful he found it to write nonfiction. 'Tis a pity, because I think he did a beautiful job of it.

Labels:

8 Comments:

Blogger writerinmaking said...

I am not a Stephen King fan either but devoured "On Writing". I enjoy all of your blogs and have 2 of them blogrolled, thanks for the good reading.

10:37 PM  
Blogger Katharine Swan said...

Thanks for the comment! Your blog looks great, too - I already posted a comment - and I will be sure to add it to my own blogroll (whenever I actually finish it...).

3:51 AM  
Blogger Catherine said...

I listened to On Writing as an audiobook and highly recommend it. Stephen King reads it himself. I listened to most of it on the treadmill and the part where he publishes Carrie is good for the endorphins.

2:49 PM  
Blogger Katharine Swan said...

The part where he publishes Carrie was my favorite part too. :o)

3:05 PM  
Blogger Karen said...

I, too, haven't been a Stephen King fan but I just might check out "On Writing."

6:19 AM  
Blogger kerri said...

I had bought this book a while back and it's still just sitting on my bookshelf waiting to be read. So thank you for mentioning it- I'm pretty excited to read it now!

2:40 PM  
Anonymous Anastice said...

Hi there. I'm a King fan and have read On Writing as well. I find it odd you say you don't like his novels because they aren't descriptive enough because I actually find them very descriptive - especially The Talisman. I actually found your post because I googled "stephen king on writing descriptions"!

4:26 PM  
Blogger Katharine Swan said...

Thanks for the comment, Anastice! I'm glad Stephen King's writing style works for you. It just didn't for me.

And Kerri -- sorry it took me so long to respond, but I'm glad you were inspired to read the book after running across my post. I'm sure you will enjoy it. If you've already read it and come back to the site, I hope you'll comment again to give us a "before and after."

4:33 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home